There is an issue with the cache - please click CTRL + F5 to refresh fully and display correctly. Thank you!
So you think you're too ill for Natural Healing?
Created on: 2025-03-14
In day-to-day life, I often meet people who tell me about their chronic illness. I know people hate a hard sell, but they've told me they have a problem, and I'm able to help, so I tread carefully and let them know I'm a healer.
Very often they then tell me that their illness is so bad, it would be beyond the capacity of natural healing to help.
At that point I usually say something like, "Well, it's a lot more powerful than most people know," and leave it to them to question further. Most people don't take the bait, which is a shame for them.
Most people think that healing falls into three categories:
- Herbs and other natural healing approaches are for the small stuff;
- Orthodox, pharmaceutical medicine is for the big stuff;
- If orthodox medicine doesn't work for you, you're screwed.
But that's not my perception at all.
Here's some of my mentor's story. As a young woman she wanted to heal people, so she enrolled in (orthodox) medical school, and then set up a family practice.
Of the 1,000 or so patients on her books, she noticed there were maybe 3 deaths per year that were unexpected - not due to old age, etc.
These troubled her, so she looked into each one. She found that all of her prescriptions for them had followed the standard of care, there was no problem there, but looking at the known side effects of their drugs, the manner of their passing suggested the drugs may have had something to do with their deaths.
So she started looking into natural healing - diet, lifestyle, etc., and started offering her patients a choice. She'd say something like:
"So Mr Smith, your diagnosis is [whatever], and the standard drug for this is [such and such]. But here's the packet insert, let's go through the possible side effects, just so you know what could happen if you take this drug. . . . Now, I can make you a prescription for this, or we can talk about diet and lifestyle. Which way do you want to go?"
Most of her patients opted for diet and lifestyle - natural healing. This was enough of a shift for the unexpected deaths in her practice to drop to zero, and for the doctor to stop getting emergency calls in the wee hours - a win for everyone.
Over the next ten years she learned more and more, and was in a unique position to see the effects of the standard of care / pharmaceutical medicine, versus a natural healing approach. She was shocked by how powerful natural healing was, and that she could usually achieve more that way.
All of this was perfectly legal, by the way. However, by the end of the ten years, the local pharma drug reps got wind of what she was doing, and she was placed "under investigation".
She thought, "Why fight this? My medical license is only a license to prescribe pharmaceuticals, which I'm hardly doing anyway." She knew by then how the system was stacked against rebel doctors, so she just handed over her medical license.
She then moved to working exclusively with natural healing. I'm not saying the transition was easy, but she did it, and became a much sought after guru up until her (semi-) retirement.
But before all of that happened, here's a story which will knock you out.
There was a man who went to his doctors, and was given three pieces of bad news:
- He was in heart failure;
- he needed a heart transplant;
- even if a heart became available, he was too ill to survive the operation.
Since the doctors were unable to offer any solution, they put him in a ward which was basically a "departure lounge". He was given a life expectancy measured in days (I think it was about a fortnight).
At this point, his family got in touch with the rebel doctor. She asked them straight, "Are you prepared to provide all of this man's food and drink? He is not even to drink hospital water."
They assented, and she gave them their instructions.
Next, she spoke to a cardiologist on the ward who she knew as a friend, and asked if he'd put certain supplements in the man's drip. The cardiologist agreed.
The man's recovery was dramatic. Within four days - four days! - he was up, walking about, shaving himself, and asking lots of questions. Not long after that he was discharged from the hospital. The doctor kept in touch with him, and he was still alive some years later.
How about you?
The above story is striking because of the speed of recovery. A full recovery usually takes longer. People I see for help with their health often see some change quickly, even within days, but for major changes in health, it's best to think ahead in terms of months.
However, if you're ill, and tempted to say you're too far gone for natural healing, can you really say you're in a worse state than the man described? Very few can say that, and if you've read this far, that alone tells me it's very unlikely.
To be clear - I don't do emergencies, unless it's someone I know personally. So if you're unwell, and looking for guidance to heal, please, for the love of God, don't wait until it's an emergency.
- Antony
Subscribe:
Recent Posts:
Upcoming Live Talk - The Great Demonstration - 30th March - Newcastle on Tyne, UK

A live talk on medical, legal, and vaccine history.
10 Mar '25
Covid Day of Reflection

Today, the UK government wants us to remember covid. So glad they asked . . .
9 Mar '25
International Women's Day & Dr Suzanne Humphries

Celebrating the achievements and contribution of Dr Suzanne Humphries.
8 Mar '25